From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] vfio: extract setup logic out of
 pci_vfio_map_resource
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:17:16 +0200
Message-ID: <20160510151716.29234a56@jvn>
References: <1461937456-22943-1-git-send-email-viktorin@rehivetech.com>
 <1461937456-22943-11-git-send-email-viktorin@rehivetech.com>
 <C6ECDF3AB251BE4894318F4E451236978210B7EA@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <20160510145826.637af9a5@jvn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, David Marchand
 <david.marchand@6wind.com>, "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>, Santosh
 Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com>, "Stephen Hemminger"
 <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from wes1-so1.wedos.net (wes1-so1.wedos.net [46.28.106.15])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F759AA0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 10 May 2016 15:17:13 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20160510145826.637af9a5@jvn>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Tue, 10 May 2016 14:58:26 +0200
Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 10 May 2016 11:53:21 +0000
> "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Jan,
> > 
> >   
> > >  	/*
> > > -	 * at this point, we know at least one port on this device is bound to
> > > VFIO,
> > > -	 * so we can proceed to try and set this particular port up
> > > -	 */
> > > -
> > > -	/* check if the group is viable */
> > > -	ret = ioctl(vfio_group_fd, VFIO_GROUP_GET_STATUS,
> > > &group_status);
> > > -	if (ret) {
> > > -		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "  %s cannot get group status, "
> > > -				"error %i (%s)\n", pci_addr, errno,
> > > strerror(errno));
> > > -		close(vfio_group_fd);
> > > -		clear_current_group();
> > > -		return -1;
> > > -	} else if (!(group_status.flags & VFIO_GROUP_FLAGS_VIABLE)) {
> > > -		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "  %s VFIO group is not viable!\n",
> > > pci_addr);
> > > -		close(vfio_group_fd);
> > > -		clear_current_group();
> > > -		return -1;
> > > -	}
> > > -    
> > 
> > I think you've lost this bit when moving things around. I can't find any viability checks in eal_vfio.c  
> 
> Thanks for this catch, I'll check. I've rebased the patch set once
> because there were some changes to the original VFIO code. Hope for no
> more such rebasing.

OK. Confirmed. Fixed for v2.

Jan

> 
> Regards
> Jan
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Anatoly  
> 
> 
> 



-- 
  Jan Viktorin                E-mail: Viktorin@RehiveTech.com
  System Architect            Web:    www.RehiveTech.com
  RehiveTech
  Brno, Czech Republic