From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerin Jacob Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] config/armv8a: disable igb_uio Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 08:30:01 +0530 Message-ID: <20160512030000.GA3084@localhost.localdomain> References: <1462974479-26180-1-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> <20160511082259.42905f98@xeon-e3> <20160511170215.GA1637@localhost.localdomain> <20160511112559.69dcff13@xeon-e3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Hemant Agrawal , , , , To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0077.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.110.77]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202D766DB for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 05:00:27 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160511112559.69dcff13@xeon-e3> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:25:59AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Wed, 11 May 2016 22:32:16 +0530 > Jerin Jacob wrote: > > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 08:22:59AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > On Wed, 11 May 2016 19:17:58 +0530 > > > Hemant Agrawal wrote: > > > > > > > IGB_UIO not supported for arm64 arch in kernel so disable. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal > > > > Reviewed-by: Santosh Shukla > > > > > > Really, I have use IGB_UIO on ARM64 > > > > May I know what is the technical use case for igb_uio on arm64 > > which cannot be addressed through vfio or vfioionommu. > > I was running on older kernel which did not support vfioionommu mode. That way if we see older and latest kernel does not have ibg_uio(due to sysfs mmap issue) support .If you are back-porting the changes I recommend to back port vfioionommu changes to old kernel. If it comes to out of tree then dpdk out of tree configuration can also set CONFIG_RTE_EAL_IGB_UIO or even while configuring dpdk. IMO, It is better to keep arm64 dpdk.org changes inline with upstream arm64 linux kernel changes. What do you think?