From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] DPDK PMD for ThunderX NIC device
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:08:37 +0100
Message-ID: <20160608150837.GA24684@bricha3-MOBL3>
References: <1464540424-12631-1-git-send-email-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
 <57580FE4.3060808@intel.com>
 <20160608124319.GA4449@localhost.localdomain>
 <28207692.5xZGMHagFl@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
 Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38CAADEA
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  8 Jun 2016 17:08:41 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <28207692.5xZGMHagFl@xps13>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:42:14PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-06-08 18:13, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:30:28PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > > Hi Jerin,
> > > 
> > > In patch subject, as tag, other drivers are using only driver name, and
> > > Intel drivers also has "driver/base", since base code has some special
> > > case. For thunderx, what do you think about keeping subject as:
> > >  "thunderx: ...."
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi Ferruh,
> > 
> > We may add crypto or other builtin ThunderX HW accelerated block drivers
> > in future to DPDK.
> > So that is the reason why I thought of keeping the subject as thunderx/nicvf.
> > If you don't have any objection then I would like to keep it as
> > thunderx/nicvf or just nicvf.
> 
> I don't like the name nicvf but I guess that's the official name?
> 
> Thus I agree the title should be thunderx/nicvf or thunderx_nicvf.

I think I'd prefer the underscore version.

/Bruce