From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerin Jacob Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: add tunnel and port RSS offload types Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:16:40 +0530 Message-ID: <20160616114639.GB27345@localhost.localdomain> References: <1459250409-5123-2-git-send-email-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <1459371063-7376-1-git-send-email-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <1459371063-7376-2-git-send-email-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <5225707.tBhOtrJBS3@xps13> <20160401142933.GA10115@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: , , , To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0089.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.89]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEAEC4F4 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:47:04 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160401142933.GA10115@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 07:59:33PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 04:04:13PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2016-03-31 02:21, Jerin Jacob: > > > - added VXLAN, GENEVE and NVGRE tunnel flow types > > > - added PORT flow type for accounting physical/virtual > > > port or channel number in flow creation > > > > These API change could be considered for 16.07 if they are motivated > > by any use. Please bring some use cases, thanks. > > The use case is to spray the packets to multiple queues using RSS on > Tunnel type packets. > > Considering the case if RSS hash does not account inner packet in tunnel > case, the packet always to go a particular queue as mostly likely > outer header remains same in tunnel packets and RSS spread > will not be achieved in tunnel packets case. > > This feature is part of the RSS capability of ThunderX > NIC HW. Which, we are planning to upstream on next release. > > I thought of pushing the common code changes first. Ping Can we merge this changeset if their are no concerns? and their is a real consumer for this, http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-June/041374.html Jerin