From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuanhan Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/13] e1000: move pci device ids to driver Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:05:15 +0800 Message-ID: <20160711060515.GX26521@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1453120248-28274-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com> <2858831.tSF8KXeB50@xps13> <20160711053326.GW26521@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> <1698058.nWbIbKdPp2@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org, David Marchand , stephen@networkplumber.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, pmatilai@redhat.com, christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com, Wenzhuo Lu , ferruh.yigit@intel.com, Rasesh Mody , johndale@cisco.com, Yong Wang To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2BA2B93 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:02:54 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1698058.nWbIbKdPp2@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:56:16AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-07-11 13:33, Yuanhan Liu: > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 03:31:27PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 2016-04-20 14:43, David Marchand: > > > > test application and kni still want to know e1000 pci devices. > > > > So let's create headers in the driver that will be used by them. > > > > > > There is also an usage of ixgbe ID for the broken bypass API. > > > > > > Sharing those PCI ids outside of the drivers was really a wrong idea. > > > So this a plan to get rid of them: > > > > > > 1/ remove need in PCI autotest (done: http://dpdk.org/commit/1dbba165) > > > 2/ move PCI ids in bnx2x, bnxt, e1000, enic, fm10k, i40e, virtio, vmxnet3 > > > 3/ remove KNI ethtool (only igb/ixgbe support) > > > 4/ remove bypass API or move it to ixgbe specific API > > > 5/ move remaining PCI ids in igb and ixgbe drivers > > > > > > Please driver maintainers, move your PCI ids in your drivers as soon as > > > possible. Thanks > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > I'm not quite sure I understood it well: are you asking us to resend > > what David has already send, say me for resending the virtio part? > > > > If so, what's the point of that? What's worse, it's likely to fail > > apply (due to conflicts), as every one of us make a patch based on > > the same base while touching some same files. > > Good point. > There were some changes since the patches from David (and a new bnxt). > That's why I was thinking to ask maintainers to take care of this change. > But maybe it's better to do the change in one patchset. Yes, I'd think so. --yliu > David, ok to refresh these patches?