From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] remove vhost-cuse
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:42:08 +0800
Message-ID: <20160715084208.GF5146@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <20160711035955.GA18850@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
 "Loftus, Ciara" <ciara.loftus@intel.com>,
 Huawei Xie <huawei.xie@intel.com>,
 "Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>,
 "Wang, Zhihong" <zhihong.wang@intel.com>, "Hu, Jiayu" <jiayu.hu@intel.com>,
 Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652802A66
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 10:39:06 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160711035955.GA18850@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

You see that no body cares it :)

So I will make a patch to mark vhost-cuse as deprecated shortly.
Thomas, works to you?

	--yliu

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:59:55AM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> It's something echoed around in my mind for a long while, and here I'm
> gonna make it public: a proposal to remove vhost-cuse.
> 
> Vhost-cuse was invented before vhost-user exist. The both are actually
> doing the same thing: a vhost-net implementation in user space. But they
> are not exactly the same thing.
> 
> Firstly, vhost-cuse is harder for use; no one seems to care it, either.
> Furthermore, since v2.1, a large majority of development effort has gone
> to vhost-user. For example, we extended the vhost-user spec to add the
> multiple queue support. We also added the vhost-user live migration at
> v16.04 and the latest one, vhost-user reconnect that allows vhost app
> restart without restarting the guest. Both of them are very important
> features for product usage and none of them works for vhost-cuse.
> 
> You now see that the difference between vhost-user and vhost-cuse is
> big (and will be bigger and bigger as time moves forward), that you
> should never use vhost-cuse, that we should drop it completely.
> 
> The remove would also result to a much cleaner code base, allowing us
> to do all kinds of extending easier.
> 
> A talk with Huawei offline showed that he backs this proposal. I was
> also told by Ciara that she actually had the same idea: she has already
> cooked a patch to remove vhost-cuse support from OVS:
> 
>     http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-July/074696.html
> 
> So I'm proposing to mark vhost-cuse as deprecated in this release and
> remove it completely at the next release (v16.11).
> 
> Comments/thoughts, or objections?
> 
> 	--yliu