From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Shaw <jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add ptype and xsum handling in i40e rx
 vpmd
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:47:27 -0700
Message-ID: <20160901144727.GA92363@ar11-dell-r730-02-jeff.jf.intel.com>
References: <1468515542-39207-1-git-send-email-jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com>
 <1542652.v1vhCPdXLZ@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Jeff Shaw <jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org,
 helin.zhang@intel.com, jingjing.wu@intel.com, damarion@cisco.com
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77492716
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  1 Sep 2016 16:50:13 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1542652.v1vhCPdXLZ@xps13>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:26:23PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-07-14 09:59, Jeff Shaw:
> > Our testing suggests minimal (in some cases zero) impact to core-bound
> > forwarding throughput as measured by testpmd. Throughput increase is
> > observed in l3fwd as now the vpmd can be used with hw_ip_checksum
> > enabled and without needing '--parse-ptype'.
> > 
> > The benefits to applications using this functionality is realized when
> > Ethernet processing and L3/L4 checksum validation can be skipped.
> > 
> > We hope others can also test performance in their applications while
> > conducting a review of this series.
> 
> Thanks for the patches. They need some careful review and are a bit late
> for an integration in 16.07. Thus they are pending for 16.11.

Hello, I noticed there are other patches going into i40e ahead of this
one. Would somebody please review and merge this one if there are no
issues?

Thanks,
Jeff