From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/kni: add KNI PMD
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 10:25:45 +0100
Message-ID: <20160908092545.GA37096@bricha3-MOBL3>
References: <1473157994-25101-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
 <2985356.Pbo0hBOtBI@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2109374
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  8 Sep 2016 11:25:49 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2985356.Pbo0hBOtBI@xps13>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:44:55AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-09-06 11:33, Ferruh Yigit:
> > Add KNI PMD which wraps librte_kni for ease of use.
> > 
> > KNI PMD can be used as any regular PMD to send / receive packets to the
> > Linux networking stack.
> 
> Good move!
> Why not deprecate librte_kni and move all the code in the PMD later?

+1 to this plan. However, I don't think it all needs to be done in one patchset,
though, does it?