From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Hall Subject: Re: LPM6 next hop size Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:55:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20160922175543.GA19530@mhcomputing.net> References: <20160919212257.GA27713@mhcomputing.net> <3263960.cPWMKkvuZx@xps13> <20160921172905.GA7158@mhcomputing.net> <20160921164205.000645d8@xeon-e3> <20160922015034.GA10277@mhcomputing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Thomas Monjalon , "dev@dpdk.org" , Nikita Kozlov To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB482C4B for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:55:44 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:07:46PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > If you have 2G of huge memory and one 16M routes then the rules start to > kill an application. > Since huge memory is unpageable (pinned) then it is limited. Won't paging out routes result in very poor network performance?