From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Kinzie Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "bonding: use existing enslaved device queues" Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 22:02:28 -0400 Message-ID: <20161007020225.GA22829@roosta.home> References: <1473251290-22053-1-git-send-email-i.maximets@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Declan Doherty , Heetae Ahn , Yuanhan Liu , Bernard Iremonger , stable@dpdk.org To: Ilya Maximets Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1473251290-22053-1-git-send-email-i.maximets@samsung.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed Sep 07 15:28:10 +0300 2016, Ilya Maximets wrote: > This reverts commit 5b7bb2bda5519b7800f814df64d4e015282140e5. > > It is necessary to reconfigure all queues every time because configuration > can be changed. > > For example, if we're reconfiguring bonding device with new memory pool, > already configured queues will still use the old one. And if the old > mempool be freed, application likely will panic in attempt to use > freed mempool. > > This happens when we use the bonding device with OVS 2.6 while MTU > reconfiguration: > > PANIC in rte_mempool_get_ops(): > assert "(ops_index >= 0) && (ops_index < RTE_MEMPOOL_MAX_OPS_IDX)" failed > > Cc: > Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets > --- > drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c | 10 ++-------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c > index b20a272..eb5b6d1 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c > +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c > @@ -1305,8 +1305,6 @@ slave_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *bonded_eth_dev, > struct bond_rx_queue *bd_rx_q; > struct bond_tx_queue *bd_tx_q; > > - uint16_t old_nb_tx_queues = slave_eth_dev->data->nb_tx_queues; > - uint16_t old_nb_rx_queues = slave_eth_dev->data->nb_rx_queues; > int errval; > uint16_t q_id; > > @@ -1347,9 +1345,7 @@ slave_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *bonded_eth_dev, > } > > /* Setup Rx Queues */ > - /* Use existing queues, if any */ > - for (q_id = old_nb_rx_queues; > - q_id < bonded_eth_dev->data->nb_rx_queues; q_id++) { > + for (q_id = 0; q_id < bonded_eth_dev->data->nb_rx_queues; q_id++) { > bd_rx_q = (struct bond_rx_queue *)bonded_eth_dev->data->rx_queues[q_id]; > > errval = rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(slave_eth_dev->data->port_id, q_id, > @@ -1365,9 +1361,7 @@ slave_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *bonded_eth_dev, > } > > /* Setup Tx Queues */ > - /* Use existing queues, if any */ > - for (q_id = old_nb_tx_queues; > - q_id < bonded_eth_dev->data->nb_tx_queues; q_id++) { > + for (q_id = 0; q_id < bonded_eth_dev->data->nb_tx_queues; q_id++) { > bd_tx_q = (struct bond_tx_queue *)bonded_eth_dev->data->tx_queues[q_id]; > > errval = rte_eth_tx_queue_setup(slave_eth_dev->data->port_id, q_id, > -- > 2.7.4 > NAK There are still some users of this code. Let's give them a chance to comment before removing it. Thanks, Eric