From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] i40e: vector poll-mode driver on ARM64 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:44:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20161017144434.GA228948@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1472032425-16136-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> <1476417604-22400-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: helin.zhang@intel.com, jingjing.wu@intel.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, dev@dpdk.org, qi.z.zhang@intel.com To: Jianbo Liu Return-path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11536CA8 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:44:38 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1476417604-22400-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:29:59AM +0530, Jianbo Liu wrote: > This patch set is to implement i40e vector PMD on ARM64. > For x86, vPMD is only reorganized, there should be no performance loss. > > v1 -> v2 > - rebase to dpdk-next-net/rel_16_11 > > Jianbo Liu (5): > i40e: extract non-x86 specific code from vector driver > i40e: implement vector PMD for ARM architecture > i40e: enable i40e vector PMD on ARMv8a platform > i40e: make vector driver filenames consistent > maintainers: claim i40e vector PMD on ARM > While I haven't reviewed the ARM code, I have run a very quick sanity check on an IA platform and saw no performance regression there. Acked-by: Bruce Richardson