From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] i40e: vector poll-mode driver on ARM64 Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:20:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20161019092038.GA27816@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1472032425-16136-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> <1476417604-22400-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> <20161017144434.GA228948@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: helin.zhang@intel.com, jingjing.wu@intel.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, dev@dpdk.org, qi.z.zhang@intel.com To: Jianbo Liu Return-path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F7C6CCC for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:20:43 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161017144434.GA228948@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 03:44:34PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:29:59AM +0530, Jianbo Liu wrote: > > This patch set is to implement i40e vector PMD on ARM64. > > For x86, vPMD is only reorganized, there should be no performance loss. > > > > v1 -> v2 > > - rebase to dpdk-next-net/rel_16_11 > > > > Jianbo Liu (5): > > i40e: extract non-x86 specific code from vector driver > > i40e: implement vector PMD for ARM architecture > > i40e: enable i40e vector PMD on ARMv8a platform > > i40e: make vector driver filenames consistent > > maintainers: claim i40e vector PMD on ARM > > > While I haven't reviewed the ARM code, I have run a very quick sanity > check on an IA platform and saw no performance regression there. > > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson Applied to dpdk-next-net/rel_16_11 /Bruce