From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerin Jacob Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH v2] libeventdev: event driven programming model framework for DPDK Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 23:00:34 +0530 Message-ID: <20161026173032.GA27950@localhost.localdomain> References: <20161005072451.GA2358@localhost.localdomain> <1476214216-31982-1-git-send-email-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <20161025174904.GA18333@localhost.localdomain> <20161026124325.GA33288@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, gage.eads@intel.com, narender.vangati@intel.com, thomas.monjalon@6wind.com To: Bruce Richardson Return-path: Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam03on0073.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.42.73]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3001FBB14 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:31:02 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161026124325.GA33288@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:43:25PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:19:05PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 01:00:16AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote: > > > Thanks to Intel and NXP folks for the positive and constructive feedback > > > I've received so far. Here is the updated RFC(v2). > > > > > > I've attempted to address as many comments as possible. > > > > > > This series adds rte_eventdev.h to the DPDK tree with > > > adequate documentation in doxygen format. > > > > > > Updates are also available online: > > > > > > Related draft header file (this patch): > > > https://rawgit.com/jerinjacobk/libeventdev/master/rte_eventdev.h > > > > > > PDF version(doxgen output): > > > https://rawgit.com/jerinjacobk/libeventdev/master/librte_eventdev_v2.pdf > > > > > > Repo: > > > https://github.com/jerinjacobk/libeventdev > > > > > > > Hi Community, > > > > So far, I have received constructive feedback from Intel, NXP and Linaro folks. > > Let me know, if anyone else interested in contributing to the definition of eventdev? > > > > If there are no major issues in proposed spec, then Cavium would like work on > > implementing and up-streaming the common code(lib/librte_eventdev/) and > > an associated HW driver.(Requested minor changes of v2 will be addressed > > in next version). > > > > We are planning to submit the work for 17.02 or 17.05 release(based on > > how implementation goes). > > > > Hi Jerin, Hi Bruce, > > thanks for driving this. In terms of the common code framework, when > would you see that you might have something to upstream for that? As you > know, we've been working on a software implementation which we are now > looking to move to the eventdev APIs, and which also needs this common > code to support it. > > If it can accelerate this effort, we can perhaps provide as an RFC > the common code part that we have implemented for our work, or else we > are happy to migrate to use common code you provide if it can be > upstreamed fairly soon. I have already started the common code framework. I will send the common code as RFC in couple of days with vdev and pci bus interface. > > Regards, > /Bruce