From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [RFC 3/8] mbuf: set mbuf fields while in pool Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:50:49 +0000 Message-ID: <20170124155049.GA172024@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1485271173-13408-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <1485271173-13408-4-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Olivier Matz Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BF3293C for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:50:53 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1485271173-13408-4-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 04:19:28PM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote: > Set the value of m->refcnt to 1, m->nb_segs to 1 and m->next > to NULL when the mbuf is stored inside the mempool (unused). > This is done in rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(), before freeing or > recycling a mbuf. > > Before this patch, the value of m->refcnt was expected to be 0 > while in pool. > > The objectives are: > > - to avoid drivers to set m->next to NULL in the early Rx path, since > this field is in the second 64B of the mbuf and its access could > trigger a cache miss > > - rationalize the behavior of raw_alloc/raw_free: one is now the > symmetric of the other, and refcnt is never changed in these functions. > > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz > --- > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c | 5 ++--- > drivers/net/mpipe/mpipe_tilegx.c | 1 + > lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c | 2 ++ > lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > /* compat with older versions */ > __rte_deprecated > -static inline void __attribute__((always_inline)) > +static inline void > __rte_mbuf_raw_free(struct rte_mbuf *m) > { > rte_mbuf_raw_free(m); > @@ -1218,8 +1232,12 @@ static inline void rte_pktmbuf_detach(struct rte_mbuf *m) > m->data_len = 0; > m->ol_flags = 0; > > - if (rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(md, -1) == 0) > + if (rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(md, -1) == 0) { Minor nit, but in the case that we only have a single reference to the mbufs, we are always setting that to zero just to re-increment it to 1 again. > + md->next = NULL; > + md->nb_segs = 1; > + rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(md, 1); > rte_mbuf_raw_free(md); > + } > } > > /**