From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/2] net/virtio: fix
 performance regression due to TSO enabling
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 22:10:27 +0800
Message-ID: <20170130141027.GJ20916@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <20170112160256.6915ff12.viktorin@rehivetech.com>
 <20170113061309.GF9770@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <20170116071218.GN9770@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <46569522-b2c3-2a33-9111-049b73c79760@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
 <20170116111256.GA11439@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <8e8178c6-caa2-1b6e-10a0-c83820868db5@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
 <20170116112110.GD10293@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <a12848b4-76ef-29bc-f512-81bd8c1b9b76@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
 <20170130133047.GI20916@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <87152b72-8563-1515-d734-edcf2437917a@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ors=E1k?= <xorsak01@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>,
 Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
 Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>, dev@dpdk.org
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA2C3989
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:08:05 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87152b72-8563-1515-d734-edcf2437917a@redhat.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 02:54:16PM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> >OTOH, again, testing is welcome, if it's later proved to be worse on
> >ARM (which I highly doubt), I could revert them.
> Or have a per-architecture definition of ASSIGN_UNLESS_EQUAL if it
> proved to regress on ARM?

Yes, we could try that.

	--yliu