From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier Matz Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] net/i40e: fix bitmask of supported Tx flags Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 11:26:37 +0100 Message-ID: <20170206112637.5a011a7a@platinum> References: <1485258650-86193-1-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com> <1486179375-133509-1-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com> <1486179375-133509-3-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, helin.zhang@intel.com, "Ananyev, Konstantin" , Ferruh Yigit To: Jingjing Wu Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A31B14EC for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 11:26:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id c85so113496205wmi.1 for ; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 02:26:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1486179375-133509-3-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Jingjing, On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 11:36:12 +0800, Jingjing Wu wrote: > Some Tx offload flags are missed in bitmask of all supported packet > Tx flags by i40e. > This patch fixes it. Could you detail which flag was missing? Is it PKT_TX_TUNNEL_MASK? If yes, shouldn't we have a "Fixes:" line? I think most of the patchset should be merged in one patch, because changing only the mbuf part (PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK) would break the drivers that checks the offload bits at init, and this is not suitable, especially if we want to be able to do git bisect. My suggestion is to have: 1- fix i40 (add missing tunnel mask?) 2- fix missing MACSET in TX_OFFLOAD_MASK 3- change TX_OFFLOAD_MASK to include all flags (this impacts all drivers using TX_OFFLOAD_MASK) Regards, Olivier