From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pascal Mazon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] net/tap: move closing fds to pmd close from pmd stop Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:51:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20170207095112.2e7a2551@paques.dev.6wind.com> References: <20170206194038.9246-1-keith.wiles@intel.com> <20170206194038.9246-7-keith.wiles@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com To: Keith Wiles Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f182.google.com (mail-wr0-f182.google.com [209.85.128.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10B9F72 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:51:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr0-f182.google.com with SMTP id o16so36200792wra.1 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:51:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170206194038.9246-7-keith.wiles@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:40:38 -0600 Keith Wiles wrote: > At the same time remove closing fds code from pmd stop routine. > > Signed-off-by: Keith Wiles > --- > drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 18 +++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c > index 966e91a..0a7f4af 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c > +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c > @@ -350,14 +350,7 @@ tap_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) > static void > tap_dev_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) > { > - int i; > - struct pmd_internals *internals = dev->data->dev_private; > - > tap_link_set_down(dev); > - > - for (i = 0; i < internals->nb_queues; i++) > - if (internals->rxq[i].fd != -1) > - close(internals->rxq[i].fd); > } > > static int > @@ -431,6 +424,17 @@ tap_stats_reset(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) > static void > tap_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev __rte_unused) > { > + int i; > + struct pmd_internals *internals = dev->data->dev_private; > + > + tap_link_set_down(dev); > + > + for (i = 0; i < internals->nb_queues; i++) { > + if (internals->rxq[i].fd != -1) > + close(internals->rxq[i].fd); > + internals->rxq[i].fd = -1; > + internals->txq[i].fd = -1; > + } > } > > static void Ok, the series looks good to me. Acked-by: Pascal Mazon