From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] prgdev: introduce generic prgdev API Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:49:45 -0800 Message-ID: <20170208144945.0ce116ee@xeon-e3> References: <1484882498-18653-1-git-send-email-jing.d.chen@intel.com> <1484882498-18653-3-git-send-email-jing.d.chen@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, keith.wiles@intel.com, gerald.rogers@intel.com To: "Chen Jing D(Mark)" Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f43.google.com (mail-pg0-f43.google.com [74.125.83.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122B2952 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 23:49:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id 14so51560130pgg.1 for ; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 14:49:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1484882498-18653-3-git-send-email-jing.d.chen@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:21:38 +0800 "Chen Jing D(Mark)" wrote: > +struct rte_prg_dev_info { > + struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev; /**< Device PCI information. */ NAK No new API should refer to PCI devices. We are trying to make all references to devices generic. Crypto suceeded, ether is in process, but no new ones please.