From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuanhan Liu Subject: Re: [RFC 17.05] test: move tests to separate folder Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:11:22 +0800 Message-ID: <20170215021122.GW20916@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <20170214151326.7554-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <20170214154131.GA20524@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> <8e969f23-6a65-553e-25ca-593c01c9fe8b@intel.com> <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B035B9815F@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" , Thomas Monjalon , "dev@dpdk.org" To: "Richardson, Bruce" Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F2A282 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 03:08:58 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B035B9815F@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 05:30:14PM +0000, Richardson, Bruce wrote: > Just to be awkward :-), one last question: Why separate building and running > the tests? My suggestion would be to have "make test" both build and run the > tests. If there is no work to do in building them, then the time cost of the > extra empty build is negligible compared to the time taken to actually run > the tests. +1 --yliu > If we really want to build the tests without running them I'd > suggest "build_test" target instead. This keeps "make test" pretty much as > it was before. > > /Bruce