From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuanhan Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: try to shrink pfdset when fdset_add fails Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 12:37:15 +0800 Message-ID: <20170223043715.GT18844@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <20170221142530.31472-1-matthias.gatto@outscale.com> <20170222015931.GK18844@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org To: Matthias Gatto Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:01:43AM +0100, Matthias Gatto wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:59 AM, Yuanhan Liu > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:25:30PM +0100, Matthias Gatto wrote: > > > fdset_add increment pfdset->num, but fdset_del doesn't decrement pfdset->num, > > > so if we call fdset_add then fdset_del in a loop witout calling > > > fdset_shrink, we can easily exceed MAX_FDS with only a few number of fds > > > used. > > > > I'm assuming you were doing some tests like following? > > > > while true; do > > ovs-vsctl add-port br vhost_n -- ... > > ovs-vsctl del-port vhost_n > > done > > > > Something pretty close to this yes. Fixes: 59317cef249c ("vhost: allow many vhost-user ports") Cc: stable@dpdk.org And applied to dpdk-next-virtio, with few typos in commit log fixed. Thanks! --yliu