From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] get status of Rx and Tx descriptors
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:40:52 +0100
Message-ID: <20170302144052.5350f795@platinum>
References: <1479981261-19512-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
 <1488388752-1819-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
 <1d681ebc-bc85-934b-0d94-7b0b7faaaa77@solarflare.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
 <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>, <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
 <helin.zhang@intel.com>, <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
 <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>, <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>,
 <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FEB2A5E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  2 Mar 2017 14:40:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id n11so24446094wma.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 05:40:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1d681ebc-bc85-934b-0d94-7b0b7faaaa77@solarflare.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 21:02:16 +0300, Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com> wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 08:19 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > This patchset introduces a new ethdev API:
> > - rte_eth_rx_descriptor_status()
> > - rte_eth_tx_descriptor_status()  
> 
> May be corresponding features should be added to the NICs documentation?

Yes, good idea.

I propose to use these straightforward names: "Rx Descriptor Status"
and "Tx Descriptor Status".