From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] eventdev: amend timeout criteria comment
 for burst dequeue
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:19:05 +0530
Message-ID: <20170308124904.GA4827@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1486739073-10846-1-git-send-email-nipun.gupta@nxp.com>
 <1486744010-22933-1-git-send-email-nipun.gupta@nxp.com>
 <20170306132203.GA7006@localhost.localdomain>
 <DB6PR0401MB2520AC1D54AC2E0421AA7AA9E62E0@DB6PR0401MB2520.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
 "bruce.richardson@intel.com" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 "gage.eads@intel.com" <gage.eads@intel.com>,
 "harry.van.haaren@intel.com" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
To: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@nxp.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-sn1nam01on0044.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.32.44])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1FC952
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  8 Mar 2017 13:49:32 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DB6PR0401MB2520AC1D54AC2E0421AA7AA9E62E0@DB6PR0401MB2520.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 07:29:03AM +0000, Nipun Gupta wrote:
> Thanks Jerin. Patchwork still shows this patch in new state.
> Does this matter or shall I move it to accepted state?

I have moved to accepted state.
Thanks.

> 
> Regards,
> Nipun
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com]
> > Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 18:52
> > To: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@nxp.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>;
> > bruce.richardson@intel.com; gage.eads@intel.com;
> > harry.van.haaren@intel.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] eventdev: amend timeout criteria comment for burst
> > dequeue
> > 
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 09:56:50PM +0530, Nipun Gupta wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@nxp.com>
> > > Acked-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
> > 
> > Applied to dpdk-next-eventdev/master. Thanks.
> > 
> > > ---
> > > Changes for v2:
> > >  - Fix errors reported by check-git-log.sh
> > > Changes for v3:
> > >  - Corrected comment's language
> > >
> > >  lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> > b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> > > index c2f9310..29f0f46 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> > > @@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ struct rte_eventdev {
> > >   *   - 0 no-wait, returns immediately if there is no event.
> > >   *   - >0 wait for the event, if the device is configured with
> > >   *   RTE_EVENT_DEV_CFG_PER_DEQUEUE_TIMEOUT then this function will
> > wait until
> > > - *   the event available or *timeout_ticks* time.
> > > + *   at least one event is available or *timeout_ticks* time.
> > >   *   if the device is not configured with
> > RTE_EVENT_DEV_CFG_PER_DEQUEUE_TIMEOUT
> > >   *   then this function will wait until the event available or
> > >   *   *dequeue_timeout_ns* ns which was previously supplied to
> > > --
> > > 1.9.1
> > >