From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier Matz Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] NXP DPAA2 External Mempool Driver Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 18:22:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20170317182233.27374d4e@platinum> References: <1489754838-1455-1-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> <3431506.qvV2pjYT76@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Monjalon , "dev@dpdk.org" , Shreyansh Jain , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" To: Hemant Agrawal Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f181.google.com (mail-wr0-f181.google.com [209.85.128.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35C1CF90 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 18:22:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr0-f181.google.com with SMTP id u108so56242389wrb.3 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 10:22:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 17:12:59 +0000, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 7:13 PM > > To: Hemant Agrawal > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; olivier.matz@6wind.com; Shreyansh Jain > > ; ferruh.yigit@intel.com > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] NXP DPAA2 External Mempool Driver > > > > 2017-03-17 18:17, Hemant Agrawal: > > > (This patches has been split from DPAA2 PMD v8 series [1] as per > > > comments received on ML [2].) > > > > > > This patch implements the HW mempool offload driver for packets > > > buffers using the FSLMC provided DPBP object. > > > > > > The new pool is being configured using compile time option and pool > > > name as "dpaa2". > > > > > > Dependency: > > > This patchset is based on "NXP DPAA2 FSLMC Bus Driver" patchset [3]. > > > > > > References: > > > [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-March/059000.html > > > [2] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-March/059789.html > > > [3] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-March/060453.html > > > > I'm sorry, I think there is misunderstanding. > > We were saying that you should move the existing mempool handlers first. > > Have you submitted a patch for the ring and stack mempool handlers? > [Hemant] > > I will do it. But that work is independent of NXP patches? Isn't it? I'd say the existing handlers have to be moved first, to avoid to have a state where there are handlers at 2 different locations. So to me, it's just a chronological dependency. Regards, Olivier