From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ga=EBtan?= Rivet Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pci: default to whitelist mode Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:05:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20170328120529.GB7450@bidouze.vm.6wind.com> References: <1490701917-17089-1-git-send-email-gaetan.rivet@6wind.com> <20170328115852.GA14364@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f173.google.com (mail-wr0-f173.google.com [209.85.128.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A09D1E4 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:05:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr0-f173.google.com with SMTP id w43so87532955wrb.0 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 05:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170328115852.GA14364@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Bruce, On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:58:53PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: >On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:51:57PM +0200, Gaetan Rivet wrote: >> Expects all devices to be explicitly defined before being probed. Using >> the -b option will activate blacklist mode instead. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gaetan Rivet >> --- >So does this change the default behaviour when no black or whitelist >options are defined? Instead of having all devices polled, we will have >none? > Yes, precisely. I was a little quick to send this patch, I sent a new version with more explanation as for my rationale behind this change: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-March/061818.html >/Bruce -- Gaëtan Rivet 6WIND