From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: next technical board meeting, 2017-04-06
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 12:51:07 -0700
Message-ID: <20170403125107.2c23bfc0@plumbers-lap.home.lan>
References: <20170330094058.nh2nhk4ko6tsqedn@localhost.localdomain>
 <B4F733F5-B012-49B0-AA7F-D9942A6954C8@intel.com>
 <20170330170512.14476bb0@platinum>
 <5C76150C-195D-4316-AC3B-6AE2441B254B@intel.com>
 <CADNuJVqSP-VRBmFyt6EgG1CwxzQnRXKkK6okaNXBoBadS0t5NA@mail.gmail.com>
 <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D89126527834A9@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Jay Rolette <rolette@infinite.io>, "Wiles, Keith"
 <keith.wiles@intel.com>, Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>, Jerin Jacob
 <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 "techboard@dpdk.org" <techboard@dpdk.org>
To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-pg0-f46.google.com (mail-pg0-f46.google.com [74.125.83.46])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C01271
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  3 Apr 2017 21:51:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 21so130240379pgg.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 03 Apr 2017 12:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D89126527834A9@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:09:04 +0000
"Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jay Rolette
> > Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 5:03 PM
> > To: Wiles, Keith <keith.wiles@intel.com>
> > Cc: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>; Jerin Jacob
> > <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>; dev@dpdk.org; techboard@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] next technical board meeting, 2017-04-06
> >=20
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Wiles, Keith <keith.wiles@intel.com>
> > wrote:
> >=20
> > <snip> =20
> > >
> > > My Soap box comment:
> > >    I think we are limiting DPDK=E2=80=99s growth by only focusing on =
a few new
> > > PMDs and reworking the existing code. We need to look forward and gro=
w =20
> > DPDK =20
> > > as a community to get more people involved in adding more application=
s =20
> > and =20
> > > new designs. I believe DPDK.org needs to be a bigger community and no=
t =20
> > just =20
> > > a I/O library called DPDK. We need to actively move the organization =
to
> > > include more then just a high speed I/O library. Some will focus on D=
PDK
> > > and others will focus on providing a higher level applications, libra=
ries
> > > and features.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Keith
> > > =20
> >=20
> > Yes! =20
>=20
> +1

Yes but it needs some architecture. Sorry but the features flying in are
just addressing single use cases and have no unifying model.