From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: dpdk-next-eventdev git pull request for RC1
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 18:45:53 +0530
Message-ID: <20170405131551.GA30228@jerin>
References: <20170403114406.45dhs7l3mk25gnax@localhost.localdomain>
 <2321125.qHUxsz960x@xps13> <20170404102449.GA17668@jerin>
 <1785012.N3yeOaSWHM@xps13>
 <b2f2a4b5-0379-04ba-4005-878e74569610@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, bruce.richardson@intel.com,
 dev@dpdk.org
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-by2nam01on0076.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.76])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8F11DB1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  5 Apr 2017 15:16:09 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b2f2a4b5-0379-04ba-4005-878e74569610@intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:46:09 +0100
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, Jerin Jacob
>  <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> CC: bruce.richardson@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] dpdk-next-eventdev git pull request for RC1
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
>  Thunderbird/45.8.0
> 
> On 4/5/2017 9:04 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2017-04-04 15:54, Jerin Jacob:
> >> On 17-04-04 09:13:38, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> When trying to pull the tree, the compilation failed at the third patch:
> >>> 	eventdev: implement the northbound APIs
> >>>
> >>> When building for x86_64:
> >>> 	In file included from lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c:61:
> >>> 	lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h:248:10: fatal error:
> >>> 	'rte_mbuf.h' file not found
> >>>
> >>> Please, anyone to fix and check compilation on this tree?
> >>
> >> Fixed and rebased to
> >> dd18a2f0b vfio: fix secondary process start
> > 
> > Pulled, thanks
> > and congratulations for the first merge of eventdev tree :)
> 
> ICC produces following errors after merge:


How do we deal with ICC errors? I think, it shouldn't be community
responsibility.


> 
> .../drivers/event/octeontx/ssovf_worker.c(212): error #592: variable
> "get_work0" is used before its value is set
>         RTE_SET_USED(get_work0);
>         ^
> 
> .../drivers/event/octeontx/ssovf_worker.c(213): error #592: variable
> "get_work1" is used before its value is set
>         RTE_SET_USED(get_work1);
>         ^
> 
> compilation aborted for .../drivers/event/octeontx/ssovf_worker.c (code 2)
> make[7]: *** [ssovf_worker.o] Error 2
> 
> .../drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_scheduler.c(379): error #300: const
> variable "dummy_rob" requires an initializer
>         static const struct reorder_buffer_entry dummy_rob;
>                                                           ^
> 
> compilation aborted for .../drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_scheduler.c (code 2)
> make[7]: *** [sw_evdev_scheduler.o] Error 2
>