From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier Matz Subject: Re: [PATCH] mbuf: rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk bugfix Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 15:54:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20170505155451.6193fe26@platinum> References: <4935498.pT9graIqJa@polaris> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Gregory Etelson Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D6E2935 for ; Fri, 5 May 2017 15:54:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 142so7062544wma.1 for ; Fri, 05 May 2017 06:54:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4935498.pT9graIqJa@polaris> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Gregory, On Fri, 05 May 2017 16:29:59 +0300, Gregory Etelson wrote: > bugfix in rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk > > Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson Thank you for the fix. I suggest the following title instead: mbuf: fix bulk allocation when debug enabled Please refer to the guidelines: http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/patches.html#commit-messages-subject-line A description would have been welcome, for instance: The debug assertions when allocating a raw mbuf are not correct since commit 8f094a9ac5d7 ("mbuf: set mbuf fields while in pool"), which triggers a panic when using this function in debug mode. Change the expected number of segments to 1 instead of 0, and factorize these sanity checks. Fixes: 8f094a9ac5d7 ("mbuf: set mbuf fields while in pool") Can you please submit a v2 with these changes? You can validate your changes with checkpatches.sh and check-git-log.sh. Thanks, Olivier > --- > lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 24 +++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h > index 466ec00..bebe94f 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h > +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h > @@ -788,6 +788,12 @@ rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(struct rte_mbuf *m, uint16_t new_value) > void > rte_mbuf_sanity_check(const struct rte_mbuf *m, int is_header); > > +#define MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(m_) \ > + RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m_) == 1); \ > + RTE_ASSERT(m_->next == NULL); \ > + RTE_ASSERT(m_->nb_segs == 1); \ > + __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m_, 0); > + > /** > * Allocate an unitialized mbuf from mempool *mp*. > * > @@ -815,11 +821,7 @@ static inline struct rte_mbuf *rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(struct rte_mempool *mp) > if (rte_mempool_get(mp, &mb) < 0) > return NULL; > m = (struct rte_mbuf *)mb; > - RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) == 1); > - RTE_ASSERT(m->next == NULL); > - RTE_ASSERT(m->nb_segs == 1); > - __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m, 0); > - > + MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(m); > return m; > } > > @@ -1152,23 +1154,19 @@ static inline int rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(struct rte_mempool *pool, > switch (count % 4) { > case 0: > while (idx != count) { > - RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(mbufs[idx]) == 0); > - rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(mbufs[idx], 1); > + MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(mbufs[idx]); > rte_pktmbuf_reset(mbufs[idx]); > idx++; > case 3: > - RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(mbufs[idx]) == 0); > - rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(mbufs[idx], 1); > + MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(mbufs[idx]); > rte_pktmbuf_reset(mbufs[idx]); > idx++; > case 2: > - RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(mbufs[idx]) == 0); > - rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(mbufs[idx], 1); > + MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(mbufs[idx]); > rte_pktmbuf_reset(mbufs[idx]); > idx++; > case 1: > - RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(mbufs[idx]) == 0); > - rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(mbufs[idx], 1); > + MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK(mbufs[idx]); > rte_pktmbuf_reset(mbufs[idx]); > idx++; > }