From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] eal: PCI domain should be 32 bits
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:51:34 -0700
Message-ID: <20170622085134.598451d3@xeon-e3>
References: <20170621163545.25713-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <20170621163545.25713-3-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <2BFA8F2383C3784C90698C10BC0963195EEEF678@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
To: "Chang, Cunyin" <cunyin.chang@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-pg0-f49.google.com (mail-pg0-f49.google.com [74.125.83.49])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB96B2BF1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 17:51:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id e187so9462681pgc.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2BFA8F2383C3784C90698C10BC0963195EEEF678@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:28:31 +0000
"Chang, Cunyin" <cunyin.chang@intel.com> wrote:

> I think the series patches does not cover all area which need to adapt to u32 PCI domain,
> We still need some other work to do:
> we need define another macro such as PCI_PRI_FMT. Something like:
> #define PCI_XXX_PRI_FMT "%.5" PRIx32 ":%.2" PRIx8 ":%.2" PRIx8 ".%" PRIx8
> 
> PCI_PRI_STR_SIZE also need to be modified:
> #define PCI_PRI_STR_SIZE sizeof("XXXXX:XX:XX.X")
> 
> The macro PCI_PRI_FMT will not works if
> The domain exceed 16bits. It will impact the following functions:
> 1  RTE_LOG function, there a lots of RTE_LOG such as:
> RTE_LOG(WARNING, EAL,
> 			"Requested device " PCI_PRI_FMT " cannot be used\n",
> 			addr->domain, addr->bus, addr->devid, addr->function);
> 2  pci_dump_one_device().
> 3 rte_eal_pci_device_name()
> 4 pci_update_device()
> 5 pci_ioport_map()
> 6 pci_get_uio_dev()
> 7 pci_uio_map_resource_by_index()
> 8 pci_uio_ioport_map()
> 9 pci_vfio_map_resource()
> 10 pci_vfio_unmap_resource()
> All the above functions will related with the macro PCI_PRI_FMT, so I think they need to be modified too.
> 
> There are some other code need modify:
> In function rte_eal_compare_pci_addr(), we need do the following work:
> dev_addr = ((uint64_t)addr->domain << 24) | ((uint64_t)addr->bus << 16) |
> 				((uint64_t)addr->devid << 8) | (uint64_t)addr->function;
> dev_addr2 = ((uint64_t)addr2->domain << 24) | ((uint64_t)addr2->bus << 16) |
> 				((uint64_t)addr2->devid << 8) | (uint64_t)addr2->function;
> 
> In function eal_parse_pci_BDF(), we need do the following work:
> GET_PCIADDR_FIELD(input, dev_addr->domain, UINT32_MAX, ':');

Good catch, the string size must be increased.

It turns out that you don't need to change the PCI print format. Printing the domain with %.4x
works correctly with 32 bit. It just gets wider. This is how pciutils works, so no change
is necessary there.

For normal 16 bit domain, the print will be:
	0000:05.00.0
and for these 32 bit values
	100000:05:00.0

Yes, the compare needs domain cast to 64 bit. The bus/devid/function don't need cast.