From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tiwei Bie Subject: Re: DPDK & github Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:45:23 +0800 Message-ID: <20170706014522.GA19654@debian-ZGViaWFuCg> References: <12616607.9t08ciOrBu@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Trishan de Lanerolle To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1F81C0B for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 03:44:14 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12616607.9t08ciOrBu@xps> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 11:48:20PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi, > > Following community requests, the Linux Foundation tried to get > the ownership of the DPDK account on GitHub which was owned > by someone. > Good news, it worked: > https://github.com/dpdk > Thanks Trishan for the help. > > First of all, it is not planned to use GitHub and its pull request model, > as the main repository. It should be a read-only mirror. > > If a pull request is created for https://github.com/dpdk/dpdk, > we should redirect to the mailing list as Linux do with a bot: > https://github.com/ajdlinux/KernelPRBot/blob/master/message.md > > We can discuss how to organize this account for related projects or > for user repositories. Other ideas are welcome. > > Anticipating the discussion about a bug tracker, it was decided to use > Bugzilla and configure a workflow friendly with the mailing list. > As it is not available yet, we can also compare Bugzilla and GitHub. > > Configuring the account for our needs may take time, especially during > a release period. > Thanks for your patience. Great news! Thank you! :-) Best regards, Tiwei Bie