From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerin Jacob Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] service cores: cover letter Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 17:11:25 +0530 Message-ID: <20170710114124.GB17339@jerin> References: <1498735421-100164-1-git-send-email-harry.van.haaren@intel.com> <1499445667-32588-1-git-send-email-harry.van.haaren@intel.com> <3143159.FqVZFIAO7L@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Thomas Monjalon , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Wiles, Keith" , "Richardson, Bruce" To: "Van Haaren, Harry" Return-path: Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cys01nam02on0079.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.37.79]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDEC5A6E for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:41:46 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" -----Original Message----- > Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 08:18:33 +0000 > From: "Van Haaren, Harry" > To: Thomas Monjalon > CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , "jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com" > , "Wiles, Keith" , > "Richardson, Bruce" > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/7] service cores: cover letter > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > > Sent: Sunday, July 9, 2017 11:09 PM > > To: Van Haaren, Harry > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com; Wiles, Keith ; > > Richardson, Bruce > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/7] service cores: cover letter > > > > 07/07/2017 18:41, Harry van Haaren: > > > v4: > > > - Range of fixes as suggested by Jerin > > > - Improved unit tests, ensuring ex-service cores become available to app > > > - Added functions to EXPERIMENTAL tag in .map files (Thomas) > > > - Added @warning experimental notes to Doxygen API documentation (Thomas) > > > - Various smaller fixes / cleanups > > > - See commit notes for details > > > > I feel we need to wait approval from some reviewers, at least from Jerin > > who was very active on this series. > > Agreed that more reviewing eyes would be good. > > > > It means it misses the first release candidate, and it is a problem > > because this feature is updating the core. > > Correct service cores does update the core, however a review of the code-paths > taken if the service cores -s switch is not used shows that it will have almost > no impact on the EAL code path. > > > > Naive question: do we really want it in 17.08? > > I think merging in 17.08 allow us to progress on integrating services and DPDK, so I see value in including in this release. +1