From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] net/mlx5: add vectorized Rx/Tx burst
 for ARM
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 09:45:18 +0200
Message-ID: <20171009074518.GE13551@6wind.com>
References: <20171005230032.7548-1-yskoh@mellanox.com>
 <51bda660-2653-1416-539d-1333e4f0da04@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>, nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com,
 dev@dpdk.org, Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>,
 Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>, Xueming Li <xuemingl@mellanox.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395251AF03
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  9 Oct 2017 09:45:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id l68so20751244wmd.5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51bda660-2653-1416-539d-1333e4f0da04@intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 03:39:47AM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 10/6/2017 12:00 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> > Add dataplane functions using ARM NEON instructions. To modularize vectorized
> > functions for different architectures, the existing files having x86 SSE support
> > is reorganized.
> > 
> > This patchset has dependency with the following patches:
> > - net/mlx5: fix overflow of Rx SW ring
> > - Nelio's mlx5 flow cleanup patchset, the last one is:
> >   [dpdk-dev,v2,30/30] net/mlx5: add new operations for isolated mode
> 
> - Nelio's set was waiting Xueming's which is merged now.
> - Nelio's set will have v3 because of your comments.
> - And Raslan's patch is dependent on yours.
> 
> So, if I don't miss anything
> - first there will be Nelio's v3
> - Later this patchset on top of it
> - Later Raslan's on top of yours
> 
> With multiple developers working on same drivers, mlx drivers become
> hard to manage/trace.
> 
> next-net-mlx sound like good idea :) Any comment on this?

Sounds good to me too, particularly so since we do have such a tree
internally where we constantly rebase series on top of one another for
non-regression testing purposes.

-- 
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND