From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] net/i40e: fix compilation with -Og
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:52:37 +0200
Message-ID: <20171011075236.dajqfbb456etfa5g@platinum>
References: <20170911151333.5727-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
 <20170911151333.5727-5-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
 <bd0de0a4-0de6-56b0-9bdc-e3252f4e5f77@intel.com>
 <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F810E911C1@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 "Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>
To: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5575532E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:52:45 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F810E911C1@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 06:20:35AM +0000, Wu, Jingjing wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yigit, Ferruh
> > Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 7:25 AM
> > To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing
> > <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/10] net/i40e: fix compilation with -Og
> > 
> > On 9/11/2017 4:13 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > > The compilation with gcc-6.3.0 and EXTRA_CFLAGS=-Og gives the
> > > following
> > > error:
> > >
> > >   CC i40e_adminq.o
> > >   i40e_adminq.c: In function ‘i40e_clean_arq_element’:
> > >   i40e_adminq.c:1145:56: error: ‘ntu’ may be used uninitialized in
> > >                          this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> > >      *pending = (ntc > ntu ? hw->aq.arq.count : 0) + (ntu - ntc);
> > >                                                      ~~~~~^~~~~~
> > >
> > > Depending on what is defined, ntu actually be used without being
> > > initialized. Fix it by initializing it to 0, despite this is probably
> > > not the proper fix. Moreover, the error is located in base/ directory,
> > > which contains driver code common to several platforms (not only dpdk).
> > 
> > This practically seems false positive because driver makefile hard-coded both
> > defines.
> > 
> > Also ntu used before this location, not sure warning generated for here.
> > 
> > Overall I am for fixing the compile warning, but for decision maintainer cc'ed
> > because this being base code update requires maintainer communicate other
> > channels to reflect update into base code.
> > 
> Right, for base code, we are getting them from internal release.
> In principle, based code would keep unchanged until the base code update.
> 
> I will go to report this issue to base code develop team, and then make
> It be fixed in next base code drop. Is that OK?

Fine to me, thanks.