From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrien Mazarguil Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix rxq interrupt memory corruption Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:26:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20171109132619.GZ24849@6wind.com> References: <20171109131014.61309-1-shahafs@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com, yskoh@mellanox.com, dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org To: Shahaf Shuler Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com (mail-wm0-f68.google.com [74.125.82.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125D01B645 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:26:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id n74so2218749wmi.1 for ; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 05:26:31 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171109131014.61309-1-shahafs@mellanox.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 03:10:14PM +0200, Shahaf Shuler wrote: > intr_vec allocation size was wrong causing a memory corruption. > > Fixes: e1016cb73383 ("net/mlx5: fix Rx interrupts management") > Cc: adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Shahaf Shuler Indeed, nice catch. Acked-by: Adrien Mazarguil Could you submit the same patch for mlx4 against the following commit? (code is identical) 0a2ae703192c ("net/mlx4: fix Rx interrupts management") Thanks! -- Adrien Mazarguil 6WIND