From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] power: changed unsigned to unsigned
	int
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:16:56 +0000
Message-ID: <20171128141656.GA10272@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <20171128132203.43181-1-marko.kovacevic@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.hunt@intel.com
To: Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC8B2B9E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:17:01 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171128132203.43181-1-marko.kovacevic@intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:22:00PM +0000, Marko Kovacevic wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>
> ---
While I know that checkpatch complains about unsigned vs unsigned int,
is there some other reason for making this change wholesale in the code?

/Bruce