From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier MATZ Subject: Re: [PATCH] mbuf: cleanup rte_pktmbuf_lastseg(), remove useless variable Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 17:36:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20171201163639.rduvosv6aq22ukpd@platinum> References: <3DBFD712-8DA6-4FDB-B139-66398039B4C0@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Ilya Matveychikov Return-path: Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1ADF2C3F for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 17:36:51 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DBFD712-8DA6-4FDB-B139-66398039B4C0@gmail.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Ilya, On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 05:44:49PM +0400, Ilya Matveychikov wrote: > Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release") > Cc: intel.com The Cc tag seems wrong, should be removed. > Signed-off-by: Ilya V. Matveychikov > --- > > There is no reason to have local variable m2 or am I wrong? Yes, you're right. Can you please say it in the commit log? Thanks, Olivier > > lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 8 +++----- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h > index 7e326bbc2..be79e3728 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h > +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h > @@ -1538,12 +1538,10 @@ static inline uint16_t rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(const struct rte_mbuf *m) > */ > static inline struct rte_mbuf *rte_pktmbuf_lastseg(struct rte_mbuf *m) > { > - struct rte_mbuf *m2 = (struct rte_mbuf *)m; > - > __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m, 1); > - while (m2->next != NULL) > - m2 = m2->next; > - return m2; > + while (m->next != NULL) > + m = m->next; > + return m; > } > > /** > -- > 2.15.0