From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] lib/cmdline: init parse result memory
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:27:26 +0100
Message-ID: <20171208122726.GT4062@6wind.com>
References: <20171115155402.9967-1-xuemingl@mellanox.com>
 <20171208070244.24094-1-xuemingl@mellanox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Xueming Li <xuemingl@mellanox.com>, Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
 Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wr0-f193.google.com (mail-wr0-f193.google.com
 [209.85.128.193]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E9F9B6B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  8 Dec 2017 13:27:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wr0-f193.google.com with SMTP id v105so10676879wrc.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 04:27:39 -0800 (PST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171208070244.24094-1-xuemingl@mellanox.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 03:02:44PM +0800, Xueming Li wrote:
> Initialize binary result memory before parsing to avoid garbage in
> parsing result.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xueming Li <xuemingl@mellanox.com>

Since you chose to move the break statement, maybe the original commit
mentioned in my previous message (9b3fbb051d2e "cmdline: fix parsing") can
be reverted afterward? I think it makes tmp_result redundant.

Wenzhuo, as the author of that commit, can you confirm?

Olivier, no problem with breaking the loop immediately after the first
successful match_inst() call instead of the last one? (I don't see why it
would be an issue but I may have missed something)

> ---
>  lib/librte_cmdline/cmdline_parse.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_cmdline/cmdline_parse.c b/lib/librte_cmdline/cmdline_parse.c
> index 3e12ee54f..4072103f2 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_cmdline/cmdline_parse.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_cmdline/cmdline_parse.c
> @@ -168,6 +168,9 @@ match_inst(cmdline_parse_inst_t *inst, const char *buf,
>  	int n = 0;
>  	struct cmdline_token_hdr token_hdr;
>  
> +	if (resbuf != NULL)
> +		memset(resbuf, 0, resbuf_size);
> +
>  	/* check if we match all tokens of inst */
>  	while (!nb_match_token || i < nb_match_token) {
>  		token_p = get_token(inst, i);
> @@ -338,8 +341,8 @@ cmdline_parse(struct cmdline *cl, const char * buf)
>  					err = CMDLINE_PARSE_AMBIGUOUS;
>  					f=NULL;
>  					debug_printf("Ambiguous cmd\n");
> -					break;
>  				}
> +				break;
>  			}
>  		}
>  
> -- 
> 2.13.3
> 

-- 
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND