From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: About pmu cycle counter usage in armv8
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:29:31 +0530
Message-ID: <20171211055930.GA15672@jerin>
References: <676baa87-777b-ca6e-41c9-7233f90740b6@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
To: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-cys01nam02on0062.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.37.62])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A02C2C38
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 06:59:51 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <676baa87-777b-ca6e-41c9-7233f90740b6@gmail.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 13:38:25 +0800
> From: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
> To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>, "dev@dpdk.org"
>  <dev@dpdk.org>
> Subject: About pmu cycle counter usage in armv8
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
>  Thunderbird/52.5.0
> 
> Hi Jerin
> 
> In [1], I met a pmu cycle counter problem (all return value is 0)
> occasionally.
> 
> And then I submited a patch to kernel maillist, but was rejected by
> maintainer at last [2].
> 
> He said:
> 
> "We only intend for the in-kernel perf infrastructure to access
> 
> pmccntr_el0; nothing else should touch it."

Yes. That's the reason why
1) A warning added in documentation.
http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/prog_guide/profile_app.html
See at last
"
The PMU based scheme is useful for high accuracy performance profiling
with rte_rdtsc(). However, this method can not be used in conjunction
with Linux userspace profiling tools like perf as this scheme alters the
PMU registers state.
"
2) By default it is disabled and not need for production systems.
Needed only for performance debugging.

> 
> So maybe it is not proper for dpdk to use pmu cycle counter?

But, There is no alternative in arm64 to get high resolution counter in
user space(in performance effective way)

> 
> [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-November/080998.html
> 
> [2]https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/16/22
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Jia
>