From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb_uio: convert license headers to SPDX tags Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:38:06 -0800 Message-ID: <20171218153806.11935bbf@xeon-e3> References: <20171218210658.37740-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <20171218141317.502efa2f@xeon-e3> <8acb43f9-0399-aacb-2898-b4ec06d546ca@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Monjalon , dev@dpdk.org To: Ferruh Yigit Return-path: Received: from mail-pl0-f68.google.com (mail-pl0-f68.google.com [209.85.160.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2937DE5D for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:38:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pl0-f68.google.com with SMTP id z5so5807650plo.10 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:38:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8acb43f9-0399-aacb-2898-b4ec06d546ca@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:08:06 -0800 Ferruh Yigit wrote: > OK, I will update. > > Is there any benefit of following Linux kernel standard not only for kernel > modules but for all DPDK files? Nothing immediate, since SPDX usage is so new. But I expect that there will be tools and scripts that scan for SPDX and expect a certain format.