From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] pci: add req handler field to generic pci device Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:12:04 +0200 Message-ID: <2017914.N0vOHbfrR3@xps> References: <1534503091-31910-1-git-send-email-jia.guo@intel.com> <1538635483-92222-1-git-send-email-jia.guo@intel.com> <1538635483-92222-4-git-send-email-jia.guo@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stephen@networkplumber.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, gaetan.rivet@6wind.com, jingjing.wu@intel.com, motih@mellanox.com, matan@mellanox.com, harry.van.haaren@intel.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, shaopeng.he@intel.com, bernard.iremonger@intel.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com, jblunck@infradead.org, shreyansh.jain@nxp.com, helin.zhang@intel.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com To: Jeff Guo Return-path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD749239 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:12:08 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1538635483-92222-4-git-send-email-jia.guo@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 04/10/2018 08:44, Jeff Guo: > There are some extended interrupt types in vfio pci device except from the > existing interrupts, such as err and req notifier, they could be useful for > device error monitoring. And these corresponding interrupt handler is > different from the other interrupt handler that register in PMDs, so a new > interrupt handler should be added. This patch will add specific req handler > in generic pci device. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Guo > --- a/drivers/bus/pci/rte_bus_pci.h > +++ b/drivers/bus/pci/rte_bus_pci.h > @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ struct rte_pci_device { > uint16_t max_vfs; /**< sriov enable if not zero */ > enum rte_kernel_driver kdrv; /**< Kernel driver passthrough */ > char name[PCI_PRI_STR_SIZE+1]; /**< PCI location (ASCII) */ > + struct rte_intr_handle req_notifier_handler;/**< Req notifier handle */ We had intr_handle, should we name this one req_notifier_handle? May we improve the comment to better explain? (and add a space before) Maybe we need to update the comment of the other handle? struct rte_intr_handle intr_handle; /**< Interrupt handle */