From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] ethdev: add linkstatus get/set helper functions Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 08:29:02 -0800 Message-ID: <20180109082902.475cb461@xeon-e3> References: <20180108174514.14688-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20180108174514.14688-3-stephen@networkplumber.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: To: Andrew Rybchenko Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f196.google.com (mail-pf0-f196.google.com [209.85.192.196]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2973F1B1B8 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 17:29:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pf0-f196.google.com with SMTP id n6so8896880pfa.4 for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 08:29:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:30:46 +0300 Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > On 01/08/2018 08:45 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Many drivers are all doing copy/paste of the same code to atomically > > update the link status. Reduce duplication, and allow for future > > changes by having common function for this. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > > --- > > lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c > > index a524af740f4a..6674500bbc4a 100644 > > --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c > > +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c > > @@ -1495,6 +1495,42 @@ rte_eth_link_get_nowait(uint16_t port_id, struct rte_eth_link *eth_link) > > } > > } > > > > +int > > +_rte_eth_linkstatus_set(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, > > + const struct rte_eth_link *new_link) > > +{ > > + volatile uint64_t *dev_link > > + = (volatile uint64_t *)&(dev->data->dev_link); > > + union { > > + uint64_t val64; > > + struct rte_eth_link link; > > + } orig; > > + > > + RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*new_link) != sizeof(uint64_t)); > > + > > + orig.val64 = rte_atomic64_exchange(dev_link, > > + *(const uint64_t *)new_link); > > + > > + return (orig.link.link_status == new_link->link_status) ? -1 : 0; > > It still contradicts to: -1 if link state has changed, 0 if the same. > BTW, it looks like the return value of the link_update callback is not > specified (described) and not used. It explains why different drivers > behave differently and nobody notices it. It looks like link_status callback could be void. The only places that use return value from set are code that wants to log something if status changed.