From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuanhan Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net/virtio: fix typo in function name Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 22:06:35 +0800 Message-ID: <20180118140635.GK29540@yliu-mob> References: <20180118090733.12728-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <20180118090733.12728-2-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <20180118132710.GH29540@yliu-mob> <20180118134548.jf3pp447xm6hevg5@platinum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Maxime Coquelin , Tiwei Bie , stable@dpdk.org To: Olivier Matz Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180118134548.jf3pp447xm6hevg5@platinum> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 02:45:48PM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:27:10PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:07:31AM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote: > > > Fixes: c1f86306a026 ("virtio: add new driver") > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > I would not suggest to include such patch for a stable release. It doesn't > > fix a real issue. > > Yes. > > I've included it in the patchset to avoid conflicts for backports because it > changes the same code area. > > If you prefer, I can send a new patchset with the current 2/3 and 3/3, plus > the typo fix as a individual patch, on top of them. > > Does it look good to you? Yes, that's the reason I personaly always put the bug fix patches in head of a patchset, for avoiding conflicts like this. Thanks. --yliu