From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: Compilation errors in drivers/event/opdl/
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 14:26:52 +0530
Message-ID: <20180120085651.GA17077@jerin>
References: <D6881123.1A3A3D%Harish.Patil@cavium.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "liang.j.ma@intel.com" <liang.j.ma@intel.com>,
 "peter.mccarthy@intel.com" <peter.mccarthy@intel.com>,
 "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
To: "Patil, Harish" <Harish.Patil@cavium.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-by2nam03on0065.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.42.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF341B1A7
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 20 Jan 2018 09:57:22 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D6881123.1A3A3D%Harish.Patil@cavium.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 05:18:30 +0000
> From: "Patil, Harish" <Harish.Patil@cavium.com>
> To: "liang.j.ma@intel.com" <liang.j.ma@intel.com>,
>  "peter.mccarthy@intel.com" <peter.mccarthy@intel.com>
> CC: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Compilation errors in drivers/event/opdl/
> 
> [This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am seeing below compilation errors in drivers/event/opdl/, this is with
> cloned latest DPDK (git clone http://dpdk.org/git/dpdk).
> 
> ..
> ..
> /home2/hpatil/e4/jan19-inbox-submit/dpdk/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev_xsta
> ts.c: In function ‘opdl_xstats_get_names’:
> /home2/hpatil/e4/jan19-inbox-submit/dpdk/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev_xsta
> ts.c:89:2: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in
> C99 mode
>   for (uint32_t j = 0; j < max_num_port_xstat; j++) {
>   ^
> /home2/hpatil/e4/jan19-inbox-submit/dpdk/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev_xsta
> ts.c:89:2: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile your code
> /home2/hpatil/e4/jan19-inbox-submit/dpdk/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev_xsta
> ts.c: In function ‘opdl_xstats_get’:
> /home2/hpatil/e4/jan19-inbox-submit/dpdk/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev_xsta
> ts.c:124:2: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in
> C99 mode
>   for (uint32_t i = 0; i < n; i++) {
>   ^
> /home2/hpatil/e4/jan19-inbox-submit/dpdk/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev_xsta
> ts.c: In function ‘opdl_xstats_get_by_name’:
> /home2/hpatil/e4/jan19-inbox-submit/dpdk/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev_xsta
> ts.c:145:2: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in
> C99 mode
>   for (uint32_t i = 0; i < max_index; i++) {


Tested with gcc(7.2 and 5.3) and clang(5.0.1) versions. Found no issues.
Which compiler you are using?


> ..
> ..
>   ^
> 
> Thanks,
> Harish
> 
> 
> 
> 
>