From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuanhan Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] vhost: add virtio 1.1 defines Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:24:49 +0800 Message-ID: <20180129142449.GL29540@yliu-mob> References: <20180129141143.13437-1-jfreimann@redhat.com> <20180129141143.13437-10-jfreimann@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org, tiwei.bie@intel.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com To: Jens Freimann Return-path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C171B7F5 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:24:57 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180129141143.13437-10-jfreimann@redhat.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 03:11:38PM +0100, Jens Freimann wrote: > This should actually be in the kernel header file, but it isn't > yet. For now let's use our own headers. > > Signed-off-by: Jens Freimann > --- > lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h | 4 +++- > lib/librte_vhost/virtio-1.1.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 lib/librte_vhost/virtio-1.1.h > > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h > index e52a9b69c..152e8bce1 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h > @@ -167,7 +167,9 @@ struct vhost_msg { > #ifndef VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 > #define VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 32 > #endif > - > +#ifndef VIRTIO_F_PACKED > + #define VIRTIO_F_PACKED 34 > +#endif > #define VHOST_USER_F_PROTOCOL_FEATURES 30 > > /* Features supported by this builtin vhost-user net driver. */ > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio-1.1.h b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio-1.1.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000..5ca0bc33f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio-1.1.h > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ > +#ifndef __VIRTIO_1_1_H > +#define __VIRTIO_1_1_H > + > +#define VRING_DESC_F_NEXT 1 > +#define VRING_DESC_F_WRITE 2 > +#define VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT 4 > + > +#define VIRTQ_DESC_F_AVAIL 7 > +#define VIRTQ_DESC_F_USED 15 > +#define DESC_USED (1ULL << VIRTQ_DESC_F_USED) > +#define DESC_AVAIL (1ULL << VIRTQ_DESC_F_AVAIL) > + > +struct vring_desc_1_1 { Is it how it's named in the spec? If not, I'm wondering "vring_desc_packed" might be a better name? If so, we could rename others, like rename "_dequeue_1_1" to "_dequeue_packed". --yliu > + uint64_t addr; > + uint32_t len; > + uint16_t index; > + uint16_t flags; > +}; > + > +#endif /* __VIRTIO_1_1_H */ > -- > 2.14.3