From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [RFC 1/7] net/af_xdp: new PMD driver Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 15:42:17 -0800 Message-ID: <20180228154217.4aff5095@xeon-e3> References: <20180227093306.23854-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> <20180227093306.23854-2-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, magnus.karlsson@intei.com, bjorn.topel@intel.com To: Qi Zhang Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f50.google.com (mail-pg0-f50.google.com [74.125.83.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D004F2A5E for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 00:42:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id l4so1568418pgp.11 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 15:42:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20180227093306.23854-2-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:33:00 +0800 Qi Zhang wrote: > struct pmd_internals { > + int sfd; > + int if_index; > + char if_name[0x100]; why not IFNAMSIZ? > + struct ether_addr eth_addr; > + struct xdp_queue rx; > + struct xdp_queue tx; > + struct xdp_umem *umem; > + struct rte_mempool *mb_pool; > + > + unsigned long rx_pkts; > + unsigned long rx_bytes; > + unsigned long rx_dropped; > + > + unsigned long tx_pkts; > + unsigned long err_pkts; > + unsigned long tx_bytes; why not per-queue stats? per-port stats are expensive > + uint16_t port_id; > + uint16_t queue_idx; > + int ring_size; > + struct rte_ring *buf_ring; > +};