From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drivers: add common folder Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 17:01:20 +0000 Message-ID: <20180320170120.GA4260@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20180319092726.10153-1-pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com> <20180320144046.15382-1-pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com> <36228538.oZjJHnOzEO@xps> <20180320160624.GB18022@ltp-pvn> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Thomas Monjalon , jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com, lironh@marvell.com, fiona.trahe@intel.com, shreyansh.jain@nxp.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, dev@dpdk.org To: Pavan Nikhilesh Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4932BF2 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 18:01:25 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180320160624.GB18022@ltp-pvn> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 09:36:25PM +0530, Pavan Nikhilesh wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 04:45:47PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 20/03/2018 15:40, Pavan Nikhilesh: > > > Add driver/common folder and skeleton makefile for adding commonly > > > used functions across mempool, event and net devices. > > > > I am not sure there is a real benefit of introducing such new > > directory. Is it only solving the choice of where you add files used > > by several drivers? Is drivers/bus/X/ the directory of choice for > > platform shared files? > > drivers/bus doesn't seem to be a appropriate abstraction common API's > used across multiple PMD's. > > This change is in regards with the discussion on ml: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-March/092822.html > > drivers/common seems to be a popular opinion but maybe we could use > something like drivers/SoC or if you have something in mind please > suggest. > I think drivers/common is a better solution as it's not just platform buses or SoC's that this occurs with. Even PCI devices can export multiple functions, such as in the QAT case, which leads to the case where you have shared code between different driver classes. I don't think the PCI bus driver is a good place to put QAT shared code. :-)