From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerin Jacob Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] event/sw: support device stop flush callback Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 13:33:06 +0530 Message-ID: <20180402080305.GB7280@jerin> References: <1521087130-20244-1-git-send-email-gage.eads@intel.com> <1521555187-25710-1-git-send-email-gage.eads@intel.com> <1521555187-25710-2-git-send-email-gage.eads@intel.com> <9184057F7FC11744A2107296B6B8EB1E3FA88B56@FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Van Haaren, Harry" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com" , "nipun.gupta@nxp.com" To: "Eads, Gage" Return-path: Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam03on0060.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.40.60]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91AB7AAAC for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 10:03:43 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9184057F7FC11744A2107296B6B8EB1E3FA88B56@FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > > [Update: Ah I see you do this below already. Still, better check twice I think, the > > data path isn't running here anyway in case future me decides to call > > sw_flush_iq() without performing the check] > > Agreed, will fix in v5. Gage, Could please send the v5 so that I can include it in RC1 pull request.