From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Liang, Ma" Subject: Re: OPDL and 18.02 Release Notes Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 14:43:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20180409134312.GA23402@sivswdev01.ir.intel.com> References: <9B0331B6EBBD0E4684FBFAEDA55776F94C401373@HASMSX110.ger.corp.intel.com> <685f7b21-c36c-9896-36c7-c781e2390fb7@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Rosen, Rami" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "thomas@monjalon.net" , Peter Mccarthy To: Ferruh Yigit Return-path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3FC1B7F5 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 15:43:17 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <685f7b21-c36c-9896-36c7-c781e2390fb7@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 05 Mar 17:58, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 2/9/2018 12:08 AM, Rosen, Rami wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following the recent announcement of DPDK 18.02-RC4, I went over > > 18.02 release notes and I have this minor query which I am not sure about: > > In the release notes: > > http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_02.html > > we have the following: > > ... > > The OPDL (Ordered Packet Distribution Library) eventdev > > ... > > > > While in http://dpdk.org/dev/roadmap > > We have: > > .... > > eventdev optimized packet distribution library (OPDL) driver > > ... > > > > So I am not sure about this inconsistency -should it be "optimized" or "ordered" ? > > According driver documentation (doc/guides/eventdevs/opdl.rst) it is: > "Ordered Packet Distribution Library", release notes seems correct. > > cc'ed maintainers. Hi Ferruh, Team agree stay with "Ordered Packet Distribution Library" name so far. the roadmap information might need update. Many thanks Liang > > > > > Regards, > > Rami Rosen > > > > >