From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: [RFC] checkpatch: don't complain about SPDX tag format Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:49:19 -0700 Message-ID: <20180417214919.8246-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> Cc: Stephen Hemminger To: dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mail-pl0-f66.google.com (mail-pl0-f66.google.com [209.85.160.66]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A1AA48D for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 23:49:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl0-f66.google.com with SMTP id t22-v6so4126735plo.7 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:49:22 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Since DPDK developers have decided to use a different tag format than the kernel developers, ignore warnings about SPDX tags. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger --- IMHO would have been better to use the kernel SPDX style and keep the check but that appears to be a minority opinion. devtools/checkpatches.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/devtools/checkpatches.sh b/devtools/checkpatches.sh index 7676a6b50141..b438fbcd6737 100755 --- a/devtools/checkpatches.sh +++ b/devtools/checkpatches.sh @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ options="--no-tree" options="$options --max-line-length=$length" options="$options --show-types" options="$options --ignore=LINUX_VERSION_CODE,\ -FILE_PATH_CHANGES,MAINTAINERS_STYLE,\ +FILE_PATH_CHANGES,MAINTAINERS_STYLE,SPDX_LICENSE_TAG,\ VOLATILE,PREFER_PACKED,PREFER_ALIGNED,PREFER_PRINTF,\ PREFER_KERNEL_TYPES,BIT_MACRO,CONST_STRUCT,\ SPLIT_STRING,LONG_LINE_STRING,\ -- 2.17.0