From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] support for write combining Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:30:31 +0100 Message-ID: <20180427113030.GA101968@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1523455637-31719-1-git-send-email-rk@semihalf.com> <20180411144251.GA33124@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Marcin Wojtas , =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82?= Krawczyk , "Tzalik, Guy" , evgenys@amazon.com, "Matushevsky, Alexander" , "Chauskin, Igor" , Ferruh Yigit To: =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWC?= Kozik Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35536CCC for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 13:30:37 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:27:02AM +0200, RafaƂ Kozik wrote: > Hello Bruce, > > As from my last post passed ten days I would kindly ask if there are > any more comments? > > Best regards, > Rafal Kozik Hi Rafal, sorry for not responding before. The set makes a lot more sense to me now. However, just one more question? If igb_uio is passed the flag to make mappings wc, what happens if you have a mix of drivers that support or don't support wc at the driver, not the hardware level. For example, support there is one ena adapter and one i40e adapter. The hardware on both should be mappable as WC, but one driver can use that, the other can't. How is it handled? /Bruce