From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/23] lib/librte_eal: import libbsd strlcpy Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 11:36:58 +0100 Message-ID: <20180517103658.GA16984@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <152627436523.53156.4398253089110011263.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <152627457252.53156.7037125685610031955.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Andy Green Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48051DA4 for ; Thu, 17 May 2018 12:37:02 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <152627457252.53156.7037125685610031955.stgit@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 01:09:32PM +0800, Andy Green wrote: > Signed-off-by: Andy Green > --- > lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_string_fns.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_string_fns.h | 7 +---- > 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > While I'm aware this was suggested by other reviewers, I really don't feel that it is necessary to actually import the code. If libbsd is present on the system, we will use it directly. If libbsd is not present, the snprintf provides an acceptable fallback for strlcpy IMHO. Having the full function without good justification seems excessive. /Bruce